First a little history lesson. The “nofollow” is a tag that can be added by anyone webmaster to certain hyperlinks, and it will tell search engines that they shouldn’t visit that particular link. The practice was actually introduced by the mother of all search engines (okay, that’s not true, but it sure looks like it these days) which we know as Google. In light of recent revelations, I have decided that today is the day that I say enough is enough, and that the experiment with the “nofollow” tag was an honest attempt to achieve something good, but it is now time we realize that it has failed. What are these revelations which spurred this post, you might ask? Well, when I think about it, they aren’t all that recent, but they need to be addressed still!
Today it is common for most blogging platforms to include the nofollow tag in all signature links. In theory this isn’t a bad move, because the intentions of stopping comment spam are noble and in theory it should benefit bloggers. The only problem is that it does neither. Comment spam is as big of a thing as it ever was, but fortunately for us bloggers useful tools like for instance Akismet and Spam Karma have been developed, and they both individually or better yet, in collaboration do a great job filtering out trash comments.
Have you guessed yet who’s taking the heat from the nofollow tag? Of course, it’s those honest commenters who are hard at work with their own blog, that has their link to their own blog ignored by search engines. We as bloggers who use the nofollow tag are indirectly saying that comments are worth nothing to us, and that we are incapable of filtering out comments that add nothing to the conversation ourselves. There is of course the fact that human readers will see links in the comments, but in the future perhaps we can find a tag that stops them from seeing them as well? Oh wait, I think.. well never mind. My point stands that if someone comments on my blog, they deserve the “reward” of search engines reading their signature links, which is why I will soon strip out the nofollow tags from comments-links here on my blog.
Blogs aren’t the only online sites that make use of the nofollow tag however. It has also come to my attention that the good folks over at the internet monstrosity Wikipedia have decided that the nofollow tag is added to each and every external link throughout the site, in an attempt to reduce link-spam. Again we see honest intentions coming in the way of common interest. By doing this, Wikipedia is effectively saying that “OK, this is great and valuable information, we’ll pay you half of what it’s actually worth to use it on our site”. I am appalled by this move that Wikipedia has made. It says that the links to their sources are worth nothing, and if you look at the signals it sends it the fact that it demotes the value of the sources far outweighs the benefits of discouraging link-spam.
Like I said before, the nofollow tag was invented and introduce by Google themselves. What strikes me is the fact that even though blogging software developers have managed to develop systems that seperates spam (which shouldn’t be rewarded) from useful comments (which definately deserves the reward of search engines crawling their links), but Google haven’t and need us to tell them apart for the search engine? Sounds fishy, but we still have the power in our hands at least, and now it is time that we use those powers vested in us by the state of Google to declare death over the nofollow tag.
Update: Thanks to Andy in the comments and his list, I am now certifiably nofollow free! Be sure to check that list out to find your preferred solution for how to get rid of the nofollow tag.
Especially wikipedia’s latest acceptance of it. But I bet you have nofollow on comments probably, I think at least a few people are saying the same things your saying ..but the rest of the net is dead set on keeping those tags.
Yes, like I pointed out, I do have nofollow tags on the comments, but I plan on removing them. Just need to get the time to do it first. And you are right, too many people are set on keeping them, mainly because they fail to see the downsides of it.
It takes about a minute to decide which method of removing nofollow you want to opt for from my list (linked to my name), and very little time in uploading a plugin and switching it on.
Glad you found the list useful
Yeah, thanks for the tip! For me the choice was easy, DoFollow does exactly what I wanted
Also, thanks for taking the time to leave a comment. You’re a quite renowned blogger from what I’ve seen, so I can’t say I’m not a teeny bit honored
Personally I don’t think that the blogging business should rely on comments for determining who are the most popular bloggers, that is what blogroll’s are for. Overall the vast majority of people see the benefits in preventing spammers getting credit where it is not due.
You refer to Wikipedia as if it has a responsibility to help out other sites on the internet. Just because someone puts a link into an article does not mean that they should suddenly get credit for it. It is a private website that owes nothing to the websites of its contributors, spammers or otherwise.
New comment to an old post – Sure glad I have email notification on, or I would probably never have spotted it! Glad to see you, and to meet someone on the other side of the fence!
” Overall the vast majority of people see the benefits in preventing spammers getting credit where it is not due. ”
I don’t think anyone disagrees with you on this one, but the argument lies within the definition of where credit actually is due. Personally I want to reward those who takes the time to comment on my blog in any way I can, and if a comment does warrant that reward, I’m more than happy to make it my own job to see that it doesn’t get it. With the help of Akismet, I seem to be doing just fine too.
” You refer to Wikipedia as if it has a responsibility to help out other sites on the internet. Just because someone puts a link into an article does not mean that they should suddenly get credit for it. It is a private website that owes nothing to the websites of its contributors, spammers or otherwise. ”
Again I feel like you are missing the point. I am not talking about the websites of its contributors. I am talking about those sources that actually make Wikipedia what it is, that deserve, should and MUST be found by search engines, because they are highly relevant when people are searching for related terms. In many cases much more than Wikipedia, which can never be considered 100% accurate, and needs to be backed up by additional sources. When I search, I want to find these things as well, but by using the nofollow tags Wikipedia effectively lowers the chances of it happening, which they also benefit from themselves of course (though I hardly believe that is the motivation behind their implementation of the tag).
[...] I say, let’s ditch it. Let’s get rid of this little piece of code. And let’s start giving link love to everyone who comments on our blog. Isn’t [...]
[...] the dreaded nofollow attribute. Of course, I didn’t start this. But I’m convinced that nofollow must go. So much so that I’ve been asking everyone I know to spread the [...]
[...] while back I wrote a post arguing the case against nofollow, and why it has no place in the comments of a blog, just because [...]
yeah… those stupid wiki’s!
wonder what happen if we all use nofollow to them?
Have a good one.
Thanks for the idea. I will remove the “nofollow” from my blogs. hopefully it will help get more readers and comments.
Thanks.. I just found this You Comment I Follow badge today and have been checking out the sites that agree with this idea. I think it’s great and will remove the nofollows on my blogs too, though I’ll have to figure out how to do that on WordPress. I read somewhere that it’s not possible there but I’ll keep looking. I’ll check out Andy’s list, since I haven’t looked at that yet. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for the great idea, I couldn’t agree more! hopefully removing my nofollow tag will help in an increase in traffic of readers
I think the one cogent reason you have given for removing the nofollow tag is this : “We as bloggers who use the nofollow tag are indirectly saying that comments are worth nothing to us, and that we are incapable of filtering out comments that add nothing to the conversation ourselves. ” I think this more than anything else is the crucible on which the decision to remove the nofollow must lie.
Indeed a great topic to read and learn about too. Thanks bud